|
International civil society
denounce UN meeting on AIDS as a failure
published: 02 Jun 2006 — 20:07
J Blaylock
June 2nd 2006
Civil society groups from around the world denounced the final UN Political
Declaration on HIV/AIDS, released after marathon negotiations during the UN
High Level meeting on AIDS this week.
“Once
more we are disappointed at the failure to demonstrate real political
leadership in the fight against the pandemic” said The Most Revd
Njongonkulu Ndungane, the Anglican Archbishop of Capetown. “Even at this
late stage, we call on the world’s political leaders to rise up and meet
the challenges that the pandemic presents and to set ambitious targets at a
national level to guarantee universal access to treatment, care, support and
prevention.”
UN
Member States refused to commit to hard targets on funding, prevention, care
and treatment. They rejected frank acknowledgement that some of the
today’s fastest growing HIV epidemics are happening among injecting and
other drug users, sex workers and men who have sex with men. “The final
outcome document is pathetically weak. It is remarkable at this stage in the
global epidemic that governments can not set the much needed targets nor can
they can name in the document the very people that are most vulnerable”
said Sisonke Msimang of the African Civil Society Coalition.
“African
governments have displayed a stunning degree of apathy, irresponsibility, and
complete disrespect for any of the agreements they made in the last few
months” said Leonard Okello, Head of HIV/AIDS for Action Aid
International. “The negotiation processes was guided by trading
political, economic and other interests of the big and powerful countries
rather than the glaring facts and statistics of the global AIDS crisis, seventy
percent of which is in Sub-Saharan Africa.”
African
government delegations reneged on their promises in the 2006 Abuja Common position
agreed to by African Heads of State. South Africa and Egypt, in particular,
took a deliberate decision to oppose the setting of targets on prevention and
treatment, despite the fact that both participated in the Abuja Summit that
endorsed ambitious targets to be reached by 2010. “The continent that is
most ravaged by AIDS has demonstrated a complete lack of leadership. It is a
sad, sad day as an African to be represented by such poor leadership”
said Omololu Faloubi of the African Civil Society Coalition.
But
the African governments were not alone. The United States was particularly
damaging to the prospects for a strong declaration. Throughout the negotiations
they moved time and again to weaken language on HIV prevention, low-cost drugs
and trade agreements and to eliminate commitments on targets for funding and
treatment. “It’s death by diplomacy,” said Eric Sawyer,
veteran activist and 25-year survivor of HIV/AIDS. “Hour after hour, my
government fought for its own selfish interests rather than for the lives of
millions dying needlessly around the globe”
There
has however been a strong recognition in the declaration of the alarming
feminization of the pandemic. Commitments were made to ensure that women can
exercise their right to have control over their sexuality and to the goal of
achieving universal access to reproductive health by 2015.
This
progress was undermined however by regressive governments. “Syria, Egypt,
Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan and Gabon blocked efforts to recognize and act to empower
girls to protect themselves from HIV infection” said Pinar Ilkkaracan,
President of Women for Women’s Human Rights. “Their failure to
commit to ensuring access to comprehensive sexuality education for young
people, and promote and protect sexual rights will undermine the response to
the HIV pandemic.”
This
was compounded by the declaration failing to acknowledge that some of the
today’s fastest growing HIV epidemics are happening among injecting and
other drug users, sex workers and men who have sex with men, despite strong
support from the Rio Group of countries. For example, governments have ignored
the needs of injecting drug users by not stating the need for substitution drug
treatment, putting them at further risk. “Failing to fully address the
needs of these groups, and particularly to counter stigma and discrimination by
decriminalizing drug use and sexual behaviors, will render them more invisible
and ultimately lead to even higher rates of HIV/AIDS” said Raminta
Stuikyte of the Central and Eastern European Harm Reduction Network.
Again
the US, along with the European Union and other governments ensured that the
final declaration text contains a substantially weaker reference to the AIDS
funding need. It now only acknowledges that more money is needed, rather than
committing to raising the needed funds. An estimated $23 billion is needed per
annum by 2010 in order to fund AIDS treatment, care, prevention and health
infrastructure. “At this stage in the pandemic, we expected government
commitment to close the global funding gap,” said Kieran Daly of the
International Council of AIDS Service Organizations. “Instead they have
tried to let themselves off the hook.”
While
there has been a failure of governments to face the realities of HIV/AIDS,
civil society will be holding them to account. Civil society will hold
governments to account to deliver on universal access. Civil society will make
sure governments recognize and support vulnerable populations. The failure of
governments to commit will not be accepted.
EDITORS
NOTE: “Vulnerable populations” includes women and girls, youth,
older people, men who have sex with men, injecting and other drug users, sex
workers, transgenders, people living in poverty, prisoners, migrant laborers,
orphans, people in conflict and post-conflict situations, indigenous peoples,
refugees and internally displaced persons, as well as HIV/AIDS outreach workers
and people living with HIV/AIDS.
__________
For
more information contact:
Asia Russell (247) 4752645 or asia@healthgap.org or Kieran Daly (416) 2758413
__________
Please
see below for the full press release including supporting organisations
final press 2 june.pdf
(56.46 kB)
|